Supreme Court upholds Trump's travel ban proclamation as constitutional.
| President's Moment | Political | Global Trade |
Updated By: History Editorial Network (HEN)
Published:
5 min read
In Trump v. Hawaii, the Supreme Court upheld President Trump's Proclamation 9645 by a narrow 5-4 decision. The proclamation restricted entry into the United States for individuals from several countries, primarily Muslim-majority nations. The administration argued that the ban was necessary to protect national security, citing inadequate information-sharing practices and potential terrorist threats from the affected countries.
The plaintiffs argued that the proclamation violated the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, contending it was motivated by anti-Muslim animus. The lower courts initially blocked the proclamation, but the Supreme Court's decision reversed these rulings, affirming the president's authority to control immigration for national security reasons.
The decision rested on the interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which grants the president broad discretion over immigration matters. The Court's majority deemed that the proclamation fell squarely within the president's statutory authority and did not explicitly violate the Establishment Clause, as it focused on national security rather than religious discrimination.
This decision had far-reaching implications, affecting thousands of individuals who were barred from entering the United States. The ruling highlighted the contentious balance between national security and religious freedom, emphasizing the president's substantial power in shaping immigration policy. It also spurred widespread debate over the impact of such executive actions on minority communities and America's global image.
Statistics showed an immediate and significant reduction in visa issuances from the affected countries following the proclamation's implementation. Critics argued that this perpetuated stereotypes and fueled discrimination against Muslims, while supporters maintained that it was a necessary measure for safeguarding the country.
#TrumpvHawaii #SupremeCourt #Proclamation9645 #NationalSecurity #ImmigrationPolicy #EstablishmentClause #MoofLife
Primary Reference: 17-965 Trump v. Hawaii (06/26/2018)

Explore the Life Moments of Donald Trump | 