Tandja bypass legislative processes Raising alarms about the erosion of democratic norms in the country

In 2009, the political landscape of Niger underwent a significant transformation when President Mamadou Tandja began ruling by decree following a contentious court ruling that challenged his authority. This decision came amid rising political tensions and was perceived as a strategic move to consolidate power in the executive branch. The court's decision, which was seen as a check on the president's authority, prompted Tandja to bypass legislative processes, raising alarms about the erosion of democratic norms in the country. The ruling by decree was met with widespread criticism both domestically and internationally, with observers expressing concerns over the implications for judicial independence and the rule of law. Critics argued that this move undermined the democratic framework established in Niger and set a dangerous precedent for governance. The situation highlighted the ongoing struggle within Niger to balance executive power with the necessary checks and balances provided by an independent judiciary. As the political crisis unfolded, it became clear that the future of democracy in Niger was at a critical juncture, with potential ramifications for stability and governance in the region.