Grant accepted damages from Associated Newspapers

Grant's legal action against Associated Newspapers stemmed from a series of articles published in the Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday, which he claimed contained false allegations about his personal relationships. The articles, released on three separate occasions, made various assertions regarding his former girlfriends that Grant and his legal team categorically denied. His lawyer emphasized that the claims made in these articles were entirely unfounded. In a written statement, Grant expressed his frustration with the media's portrayal of his private life, stating that the publications were primarily motivated by financial gain rather than factual reporting. He highlighted the issue of fabricated sources, noting that the so-called 'close friends' or 'close sources' cited in such stories rarely, if ever, exist. This case underscored the ongoing tension between public figures and tabloid journalism, particularly regarding the accuracy and ethics of reporting on personal matters. The acceptance of damages from Associated Newspapers served as a reminder of the potential consequences for media outlets that publish misleading information, reinforcing the importance of responsible journalism in maintaining public trust.