Hilton withdrew franchise status from Minneapolis franchisee
United States
Hospitality
Civil Rights
Immigration
3 min read
Updated By: History Editorial Network (HEN)
Published:
Updated:
Hilton's decision to withdraw franchise status from a Minneapolis franchisee stemmed from the franchisee's efforts to prevent United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from utilizing their hotel. This action ignited a wave of controversy, with accusations directed at Hilton regarding complicity in ICE's operations. The situation escalated as financial expert Ramit Sethi mobilized a boycott against Hilton properties, urging his followers to cancel their reservations in protest. Concurrently, residents of Minnesota organized nighttime protests outside the hotel, where ICE agents were reportedly staying, using drums and noise to disrupt their rest. This grassroots movement highlighted the community's discontent with ICE's presence and the perceived role of Hilton in facilitating it.
In addition to local protests, civil rights attorneys initiated a campaign targeting Hilton Honors members, encouraging them to cancel their accounts as a form of protest against the company's actions. The unrest reached a peak following the killing of Alex Pretti, which led to protesters occupying a Hilton hotel in New York City, believed to be housing ICE officers. This occupation resulted in numerous arrests and further intensified the scrutiny on Hilton's relationship with ICE. The incident not only affected Hilton's reputation but also sparked broader discussions about corporate responsibility and the role of businesses in immigration enforcement.
#mooflife
#MomentOfLife
#Hilton
#Ice
#FranchiseWithdrawal
#Protests
#CorporateResponsibility
