Eliot's Review of 'Modern Painters'

George Eliot's review of John Ruskin's 'Modern Painters' in the 'Westminster Review' marked a pivotal moment in the discourse surrounding realism in literature and art. Eliot's critique highlighted the philosophical underpinnings of Ruskin's work, emphasizing the importance of truth and moral integrity in artistic expression. She argued that art should reflect the complexities of human experience and the realities of life, rather than adhering to idealized representations. This perspective aligned with the broader realist movement, which sought to depict everyday life and social issues with accuracy and depth. Eliot's engagement with Ruskin's ideas not only showcased her intellectual rigor but also positioned her as a key figure in the evolution of literary realism during the Victorian era. The impact of Eliot's review extended beyond literary circles, influencing contemporary discussions on art and its role in society. By advocating for a realist approach, she contributed to a shift in how art was perceived, encouraging artists and writers to explore themes of social justice and human experience. Eliot's insights resonated with readers who were increasingly interested in the moral implications of art and literature. Her review served as a bridge between Ruskin's artistic philosophy and the emerging realist narrative in literature, reinforcing the notion that art should engage with the world and reflect its truths. This alignment with realist principles not only enriched Eliot's own writing but also helped to shape the trajectory of modern literature, making her review a foundational text in the study of realism.