First Critic Review of Wuthering Heights

The first critical review of "Wuthering Heights" appeared in a periodical called _Atlas_, where the reviewer expressed a strong negative opinion about the characters in the novel. The critique characterized all the characters as either "utterly hateful or thoroughly contemptible," indicating a profound disapproval of the personalities and actions depicted in Emily Brontë's work. This early assessment reflects the controversial nature of the novel, which is known for its exploration of intense emotions and complex relationships. The narrative is marked by themes of primal passions, cruelty, and a sense of barbarism that permeates the interactions among the characters. Such a stark evaluation from a contemporary critic highlights the polarizing reception of the novel at the time of its release, as it diverged from the more conventional romantic literature of the period. The impact of this review was significant in shaping public perception of "Wuthering Heights." Critics and readers alike were drawn to the novel's raw emotional depth and its unflinching portrayal of human nature. The harsh critique may have contributed to the initial controversy surrounding the book, which was often viewed as challenging societal norms regarding morality and relationships. Over time, however, the novel has gained recognition as a classic of English literature, with its complex characters and themes being analyzed and appreciated in various literary contexts. The initial negative reception serves as a reminder of how literature can provoke strong reactions and how critical perspectives can evolve over time, influencing the legacy of a work.